ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2025
Rethinking chromatin accessibility: from compaction to dynamic interactions.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'In silico labelling': Exploring the biological landscape at the nanoscale using intelligent multimodal optical microscopy.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Beyond the canonical view: steroid receptor network plasticity and mechanosensitive chromatin integration in breast cancer.NAR cancer · 2026Review
- MAPK14 converges on key transcriptional machinery to promote vascular smooth muscle cell degeneration in abdominal aortic aneurysm.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Enhancing titers of therapeutic lentiviral vectors using PKC agonists.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- The shifting paradigm of chromatin structure: from the 30-nm chromatin fiber to liquid-like organization.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genome is traditionally divided into condensed heterochromatin and open euchromatin. However, recent findings challenge this binary classification and the notion that chromatin condensation solely governs the accessibility of transcription factors (TFs) and, consequently, gene expression. Instead, chromatin accessibility is emerging as a factor-specific property that is influenced by multiple determinants. These include the mobility of the chromatin fiber, the capacity of TFs to engage repeatedly with it through multivalent interactions, and the four-dimensional organization of its surrounding diffusible space. Unraveling the molecular and biophysical principles that render a genomic target truly accessible remains a significant challenge, but innovative methods for locally perturbing chromatin, coupled with microscopy techniques that offer single-molecule sensitivity, provide an exciting experimental playground to test new hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.