Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705839›Full record

ArticleESMO open2025

Actionable mutations in early-stage ovarian cancer according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT): a descriptive analysis on a large prospective cohort.

F Camarda, L Mastrantoni, C Parrillo, A Minucci, F Persiani, D Giannarelli, T Pasciuto, F Giacomini, E De Paolis, M Manfredelli and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

F CamardaUnit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/FlorianaCamarda.
L MastrantoniMedical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: luca.mastrantoni01@unicatt.it.
C ParrilloBioinformatics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (G-STeP), IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
A MinucciDepartmental Unit of Molecular and Genomic Diagnostics, Genomics Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (G-STeP), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
F PersianiBioinformatics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (G-STeP), IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
D GiannarelliEpidemiology and Biostatistics Facility G-STeP Generator Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
T PasciutoUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Data Collection Research Core Facility Gemelli Science and Technology Park (G-STeP), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
F GiacominiScientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
E De PaolisDepartmental Unit of Molecular and Genomic Diagnostics, Genomics Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (G-STeP), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
M ManfredelliScientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
C MarchettiUnit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
G F ZannoniGynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
A FagottiUnit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
G ScambiaUnit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
C NeroUnit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/CamillaNero.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the European Society for Clinical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, the therapeutic algorithm for early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is primarily based on grading and histotype. Adjuvant chemotherapy is usually recommended for high-grade tumors and for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IC; however, overtreatment remains a concern. Conversely, patients truly at higher risk of recurrence currently lack access to additional therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study presents a descriptive analysis of early-stage EOC patients who were prospectively sequenced and stratified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups based on clinicopathological features. Oncogenic alterations were identified using OncoKB and classified according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) Tier I-III. The prevalence of molecular findings was first reported for each risk subgroup, followed by an analysis on the cohort of patients who experienced relapse.

resultsA total of 180 patients with FIGO stage I-II EOC were enrolled between January 2022 and December 2023; 126 patients (70%) had at least one ESCAT Tier I-III alteration (including 51% high risk, 35% intermediate risk, and 14% low risk); among them, approximately one-quarter (26%, 95% confidence interval 19% to 35%) had an ESCAT Tier I alteration. BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations were observed in about one-quarter of patients, with BRCA2 often co-altered with POLE mutations (55%, P = 2.1 × 10

conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential for actionable alterations in most early-stage EOC patients and support the exploration of chemotherapy-free regimens for low- to intermediate-risk groups, as well as targeted maintenance therapy for high-risk individuals.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialMutationOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective Studiesactionable alterationsearly-stage ovarian cancerESCATtarget therapy

Identifiers

PMID39705839
PMCPMC11730936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.