Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Ramandeep S VilkhuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-4921
Praful K VasireddyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9957-9718
Kathleen E KishDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5088-2388
Alex R GogliettinoNeurosciences PhD Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Amrith LotlikarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Pawel HottowyAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Wladyslaw DabrowskiAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Alexander SherSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6655-6456
Alan M LitkeSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-3642
Subhasish MitraDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5572-5194
E J ChichilniskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-0248
Funding
Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY019005 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ALBRIGHT, THOMAS D · 2009 to 2018
$7.7M
Patterned Electrical Stimulation of the Retina for High-Resolution ProsthesesR01EY021271 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDUARDO CHICHILNISKY · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
Bi-directional neural interface for probing parallel visual pathwaysR01EY032900 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHICHILNISKY, EDUARDO, COGAN, STUART F · 2021 to 2024
$2.8M
Neural Engineering Training Program (NETP)T32NS115724 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI James D Weiland · 2021 to 2026
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Understanding responses to multi-electrode epiretinal stimulation using a biophysical model. · full record | OpenQuestion