Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705703›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review.

Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Jonghyung Park, Eunsil Kim, Subeen Kim, Minjae Kimm, Seoung-Ho Choi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Large Language Models in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diving into the Regulatory Landscape of Digital Therapeutics.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. State of clinical AI in 2026.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Role of artificial intelligence in gastric diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eun Jeong GongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3996-3472
Chang Seok BangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-5431
Jae Jun LeeInstitute of New Frontier Research, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-500X
Jonghyung ParkMeninblox, Inc, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-2614-6122
Eunsil KimMeninblox, Inc, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0004-0960-393X
Subeen KimMeninblox, Inc, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-8454-486X
Minjae KimmTech University of Korea, Siheung, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-7967-7247
Seoung-Ho ChoiHansung University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-095X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs health care continues to evolve with technological advancements, the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practices has shown promising potential to enhance patient care and operational efficiency. Among the forefront of these innovations are large language models (LLMs), a subset of artificial intelligence designed to understand, generate, and interact with human language at an unprecedented scale.

objectiveThis systematic review describes the role of LLMs in improving diagnostic accuracy, automating documentation, and advancing specialist education and patient engagement within the field of gastroenterology and gastrointestinal endoscopy.

methodsCore databases including MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central registry were searched using keywords related to LLMs (from inception to April 2024). Studies were included if they satisfied the following criteria: (1) any type of studies that investigated the potential role of LLMs in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroenterology, (2) studies published in English, and (3) studies in full-text format. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies that did not report the potential role of LLMs in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroenterology, (2) case reports and review papers, (3) ineligible research objects (eg, animals or basic research), and (4) insufficient data regarding the potential role of LLMs. Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions was used to evaluate the quality of the identified studies.

resultsOverall, 21 studies on the potential role of LLMs in gastrointestinal disorders were included in the systematic review, and narrative synthesis was done because of heterogeneity in the specified aims and methodology in each included study. The overall risk of bias was low in 5 studies and moderate in 16 studies. The ability of LLMs to spread general medical information, offer advice for consultations, generate procedure reports automatically, or draw conclusions about the presumptive diagnosis of complex medical illnesses was demonstrated by the systematic review. Despite promising benefits, such as increased efficiency and improved patient outcomes, challenges related to data privacy, accuracy, and interdisciplinary collaboration remain.

conclusionsWe highlight the importance of navigating these challenges to fully leverage LLMs in transforming gastrointestinal endoscopy practices.

trial registrationPROSPERO 581772; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Indexed as

GastroenterologyArtificial IntelligenceEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansaccuracyAIartificial intelligenceclinical practiceclinical reasoningdata privacydeep learningdiagnosisdiagnosticemotional supportendoscopygastroenterologylarge language modelLLMpatient engagementsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39705703
PMCPMC11699489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.