SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024
Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Colorectal Cancer Care and Clinical Decision Support: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Knowledge-Practice Performance Gap in Clinical Large Language Models: Systematic Review of 39 Benchmarks.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI in Esophageal Motility Disorders: Systematic Review of High-Resolution Manometry Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Models in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The role of large language models in dental diagnosis, decision-making, and communication: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Large language models' performance in answering common patient questions about colonoscopy: an expert-based evaluation.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Can artificial intelligence pass the test? Evaluating chatbot scores on pediatric gastroenterology board-style questions.JPGN reports · 2026Article
- Psychological Risk Assessment in Plastic Surgery via a DeepSeek Large Language Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Performance comparison of a neuro-symbolic large language model system versus conventional AI models and human experts in cholangitis management.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Diving into the Regulatory Landscape of Digital Therapeutics.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Large Language Models for Clinical Narrative Processing: Methods, Applications, and Challenges.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in Medical Research: From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Preferences of Chinese Dermatologists for Large Language Model Responses in Clinical Psoriasis Scenarios: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey in China.Health care science · 2026Article
- TheraMind: a multi-LLM ensemble for accelerating drug repurposing in lung cancer via case report mining.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- [Clinical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: A Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction Perspective].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Review
- GastroTCM: a large language model assistant for gastroenterology in traditional Chinese medicine.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
- State of clinical AI in 2026.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- Large language models for clinical decision support in gastroenterology and hepatology.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in gastric diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology Training (2005-2025): Trends, Tools, and Challenges.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs health care continues to evolve with technological advancements, the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practices has shown promising potential to enhance patient care and operational efficiency. Among the forefront of these innovations are large language models (LLMs), a subset of artificial intelligence designed to understand, generate, and interact with human language at an unprecedented scale.
objectiveThis systematic review describes the role of LLMs in improving diagnostic accuracy, automating documentation, and advancing specialist education and patient engagement within the field of gastroenterology and gastrointestinal endoscopy.
methodsCore databases including MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central registry were searched using keywords related to LLMs (from inception to April 2024). Studies were included if they satisfied the following criteria: (1) any type of studies that investigated the potential role of LLMs in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroenterology, (2) studies published in English, and (3) studies in full-text format. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies that did not report the potential role of LLMs in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroenterology, (2) case reports and review papers, (3) ineligible research objects (eg, animals or basic research), and (4) insufficient data regarding the potential role of LLMs. Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions was used to evaluate the quality of the identified studies.
resultsOverall, 21 studies on the potential role of LLMs in gastrointestinal disorders were included in the systematic review, and narrative synthesis was done because of heterogeneity in the specified aims and methodology in each included study. The overall risk of bias was low in 5 studies and moderate in 16 studies. The ability of LLMs to spread general medical information, offer advice for consultations, generate procedure reports automatically, or draw conclusions about the presumptive diagnosis of complex medical illnesses was demonstrated by the systematic review. Despite promising benefits, such as increased efficiency and improved patient outcomes, challenges related to data privacy, accuracy, and interdisciplinary collaboration remain.
conclusionsWe highlight the importance of navigating these challenges to fully leverage LLMs in transforming gastrointestinal endoscopy practices.
trial registrationPROSPERO 581772; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.