Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705696›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Promoting Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Pakistan Using a Cocreated Social Media Intervention: Development and Pilot Testing Study.

Furqan Ahmed, Ghufran Ahmad, Katharina Eisinger, Muhammad Asad Khan, Tilman Brand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Furqan AhmedDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-5489
Ghufran AhmadCardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2454-9335
Katharina EisingerDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-5947-4857
Muhammad Asad KhanHumboldt Park Health, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8608-3254
Tilman BrandDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5140-7511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is a curriculum-based approach to learning and teaching about sexuality that focuses on the cognitive, emotional, physical, and social domains. The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) CSE guideline emphasizes gender issues and is firmly rooted in a human rights-based approach to sexuality. A recent cross-sectional community readiness assessment in Islamabad, Pakistan, found that the community is at the denial or resistant stage when it comes to implementing school-based sexuality education. The reluctance was attributed to a lack of understanding and widespread misconceptions about CSE.

objectiveThis study aims to use the cocreation process to develop, pilot, and evaluate an intervention based on community readiness level to respond to community resistance by introducing CSE content, its anticipated benefits, and addressing prevalent misconceptions through awareness and promotion content for digital social media platforms.

methodsFor the development of the intervention (audio-video content), focus group discussion sessions with key stakeholders were held. Two videos were created in partnership with social media influencers and subsequently shared on Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. A comprehensive process and performance evaluation of the videos and intervention development phase was conducted to evaluate audience exposure, reach, engagement, demographics, retention, and in-depth insights. The videos were uploaded to social media platforms in June and July 2021, and the data used to assess their performance was obtained in February 2022.

resultsWith a total reach (number of people who have contact with the videos) of 432,457 and 735,563 for the first and second videos, respectively, on all social media platforms, we concluded that social media platforms provide an opportunity to communicate, promote, and engage with important stakeholders to raise awareness and obtain support for CSE. According to the findings, the public is responsive to CSE promotion content developed for social media platforms, with a total engagement (the number of people who participate in creating, sharing, and using the content) of 11,578. The findings revealed that male viewers predominated across all social media platforms. Punjab province had the largest audience share on Instagram (51.9% for the first video, 52.7% for the second) and Facebook (44.3% for the first video and 48.4% for the second). YouTube had the highest audience retention, with viewers watching an average of 151 seconds (45%) of the first video and 163 seconds (38%) of the second. With a net sentiment score of 0.83 (minimum=-3, maximum=5), end-user participation was also positive, and audience feedback highlighted the reasons for positive and negative criticism.

conclusionsTo promote sexuality education in Pakistan, it is vital to overcome opposition through sensitizing the society, and digital social media platforms offer a unique, though underused, chance to do so through reliable influencer marketing.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsSex EducationSocial MediaAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePakistanPilot Projectscommunity readinessdigital health interventionsinfluencer marketingsexuality educationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID39705696
PMCPMC11699495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.