Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705684›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

Building Communities of Practice among Undergraduate STEM Departments to Foster Emergent Transformation: A Report on the Impact of Multiple-year Engagement within the PULSE Midwest and Great Plains Regional Network.

Taylor Allen, Paul E Arriola, Caroline Breitenberger, Karen Klyczek, Kathleen A Marrs, Steven Matzner, Kathryn G Miller, Jo Anne Powell-Coffman, Mikayla Thatcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cultivating Enduring Changes in Assessment Through a Life Sciences Community of Practice.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taylor AllenBiology Department, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074.
Paul E ArriolaDepartment of Biology, Elmhurst University, Elmhurst, IL 60126.
Caroline BreitenbergerCenter for Life Sciences Education and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Karen KlyczekDepartment of Biology, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022.
Kathleen A MarrsDepartment of Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Steven MatznerDepartment of Biology, Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD 57197.
Kathryn G MillerDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Jo Anne Powell-CoffmanDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Mikayla ThatcherDepartment of Biology, Concordia University St. Paul, St. Paul, MN 55104.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vibrant ecosystem of innovation hinges on undergraduate science programs that inclusively deepen conceptual understanding, develop scientific competencies, and spark wonder and appreciation for science. To create this ecosystem, we need to influence multiple components of the system, including faculty as well as culture (i.e., rules, goals, and beliefs giving rise to them). Here we describe and evaluate a multi-institution community of practice focused on transforming undergraduate biology programs' organizational practices, behaviors, and beliefs, as well as instilling a sense of agency in community participants. The approach drew on three change theories: Community of Practice, Participatory Organizational Change, and Organizational Justice. Via mixed methods, we found that participation in the community catalyzed the flow of tangible capital (knowledge resources), grew social capital (relationships and identity), and developed human capital (creative problem-solving and facilitative leadership skills; sense of agency). In participants' home departments, application of knowledge capital was associated with increased implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. Departmental change was enhanced when coupled with use of capitals developed through a community of practice centered on creative problem-solving, facilitative leadership, conflict resolution, and organizational justice.

Indexed as

ScienceCurriculumHumansLeadershipMidwestern United StatesStudentsTechnologyUniversities

Identifiers

PMID39705684
PMCPMC11974526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.