Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705679›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

Alone and Together: Exploring the Relationship Between Individual and Social Metacognition in College Biology Students During Problem Solving.

Emily K Bremers, Olive K McKay, Julie Dangremond Stanton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily K BremersDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Olive K McKayDepartment of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Julie Dangremond StantonDepartment of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When students use metacognition, they can more effectively problem solve on their own and in groups. Most metacognition studies have focused on individual learners while a few studies have begun to explore the metacognition learners use in social settings. Little is known about the comparison between how an individual student may use metacognition in solitary and collaborative contexts. To explore the relationship between individual and social metacognition, we asked: how do life science students' approaches for metacognition while problem solving on their own relate to their metacognitive approaches when problem solving in groups? We recorded students working in small groups and conducted think-aloud interviews with the same students. By coding for metacognition, we found that students vary in their use of metacognition during individual and group problem solving. The majority of the students in our study used similar metacognitive approaches across settings, while other students showed greater evidence of one form of metacognition over the other. Interestingly, we found that students corrected or evaluated their peers' thinking more than their own thinking, and we hypothesize that group dynamics can affect students' social metacognition. We present our results in a series of cases that illustrate the variation observed and offer suggestions for instructors for promoting metacognition.

Indexed as

BiologyMetacognitionProblem SolvingStudentsFemaleHumansMaleThinkingUniversities

Identifiers

PMID39705679
PMCPMC11974522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.