Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705576›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2025

A Tailored Electronic Survivorship Care Plan for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jennifer M Jones, Andrew Matthew, Simon Tanguay, Celestia S Higano, Larry Goldenberg, Doris Howell, Manjula Maganti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03017456 (Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360°), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03017456 nacompletednot on this map

Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360°

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2017 to 2020Enrolled203ConditionsProstate CancerArmsSurvivorship Care Plan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Transition from oncology to primary care: experience of long-term cancer survivors in a Brazilian high-complexity center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer M JonesDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-8514
Andrew MatthewDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simon TanguayDivision of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Celestia S HiganoDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Larry GoldenbergDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Doris HowellDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Manjula MagantiDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough the provision of a survivorship care plan (SCP) has been recommended after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, there have been no randomized controlled trials to examine their impact. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a tailored PCa-SCP intervention provided to early-stage PCa survivors. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective, parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 sites across Canada. Early-stage PCa survivors were randomized (n = 189; 64% response rate) to receive PCa-SCP intervention or usual care. Assessments were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was change in patient activation (Patient Activation Measure-13); secondary outcomes included satisfaction with information, self-management support, prostate-specific quality of life, cancer worry, health care utilization, and health behaviors.

resultsFor the primary patient activation analyses, no significant group-by-time differences were detected. There were significant between-group differences in (1) satisfaction with information from baseline to 6 months (mean [95% CI]: 7.13 [5.53-8.71]; effect size [ES], 0.34;

conclusionsThe PCa-SCP intervention did not have a significant effect on patient activation but did increase satisfaction with information and some aspects of self-management support. Although the benefits of the provision of an SCP alone remain unclear, the PCa-SCP intervention is likely a valuable tool that can be built upon as part of a comprehensive approach to enhance the quality of care for PCa survivors.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03017456.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsPatient Care PlanningProstatic NeoplasmsSurvivorshipAgedCanadaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of Lifeprostate cancerrandomized controlled trialsupportive caresurvivorshipsurvivorship care plan

Identifiers

PMID39705576
PMCPMC12708024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.