ArticlePloS one2024
Tin prefiltration in computed tomography does not significantly alter radiation-induced gene expression and DNA double-strand break formation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic cochlear morphometry: intraindividual comparison of head CT vs carotid CT angiography, cervical spine, and paranasal sinus CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Impact of Low-Dose CT Radiation on Gene Expression and DNA Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe tin (Sn) prefilter technique is a recently introduced dose-saving technique in computed tomography (CT). This study investigates whether there is an altered molecular biological response in blood cells using the tin prefiltering technique.
methodsBlood from 6 donors was X-irradiated ex-vivo with 20 mGy full dose (FD) protocols (Sn 150 kV, 150 kV, and 120 kV) and a tin prefiltered 16.5 mGy low dose (LD) protocol on a CT scanner. Biological changes were determined by quantification of γH2AX DNA double-strand break (DSB) foci, and differential gene expression (DGE) relative to unexposed samples were examined for seven known radiation-induced genes (FDXR, DDB2, BAX, CDKN1A, AEN, EDA2R, APOBEC3H) and 667 microRNAs (miRNA).
resultsEDA2R and DDB2 gene expression (GE) increased 1.7-6-fold (p = 0.0004-0.02) and average DNA DSB foci value (0.31±0.02, p<0.0001) increased significantly relative to unexposed samples, but similarly for the applied radiation protocols. FDXR upregulation (2.2-fold) was significant for FD protocols (p = 0.01-0.02) relative to unexposed samples. miRNA GE changes were not significant (p = 0.15-1.00) and DGE were similar for the examined protocols (p = 0.10-1.00). An increased frequency of lower DGE values was seen in the Sn 150 kV LD protocol compared to the 120 kV FD and Sn 150 kV FD protocols (p = 0.001-0.008).
conclusionsThe current ex-vivo study indicates no changes regarding transcriptional and post-transcriptional DGE and DNA DSB induction when using the tin prefilter technique and even a significant tendency to lower radiation-induced DGE-changes due to the dose reduction of the tin prefilter with equal image quality compared to classical CT scan protocols was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.