ArticlePloS one2024
Use of generalized randomized response model for enhancement of finite population variance: A simulation approach.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gupta et al. suggested an improved estimator by using the Diana and Perri model in estimating the finite population variance using the single auxiliary variable. On the same lines, Saleem et al. proposed a new scrambled randomized response model (RRT) based on two auxiliary variables for estimating the finite population variance. Recently Azeem et al. presented a new randomized response model in estimating the finite population variance. It is observed that Bias and MSE of these estimators up to first order of approximation seem to lack sufficient information. In this study, we rectify the bias and MSE expressions of the estimators proposed by Gupta et al., Saleem et al. and Azeem et al. Additionally, we suggest a new generalized class of estimators that is more efficient in comparison to the previously considered estimators. A simulation study is conducted to establish the behavior of the estimators. The suggested estimator performs better than the estimators considered by the authors earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.