ArticlePloS one2024
Improving prediction of solar radiation using Cheetah Optimizer and Random Forest.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A GAN-based approach to solar radiation prediction: data augmentation and model optimization for Saudi Arabia.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Leveraging spatial data infrastructure for machine learning based building energy performance prediction.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the contemporary context of a burgeoning energy crisis, the accurate and dependable prediction of Solar Radiation (SR) has emerged as an indispensable component within thermal systems to facilitate renewable energy generation. Machine Learning (ML) models have gained widespread recognition for their precision and computational efficiency in addressing SR prediction challenges. Consequently, this paper introduces an innovative SR prediction model, denoted as the Cheetah Optimizer-Random Forest (CO-RF) model. The CO component plays a pivotal role in selecting the most informative features for hourly SR forecasting, subsequently serving as inputs to the RF model. The efficacy of the developed CO-RF model is rigorously assessed using two publicly available SR datasets. Evaluation metrics encompassing Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and coefficient of determination (R2) are employed to validate its performance. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that the CO-RF model surpasses other techniques, Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network, and standalone Random Forest (RF), both in the training and testing phases of SR prediction. The proposed CO-RF model outperforms others, achieving a low MAE of 0.0365, MSE of 0.0074, and an R2 of 0.9251 on the first dataset, and an MAE of 0.0469, MSE of 0.0032, and R2 of 0.9868 on the second dataset, demonstrating significant error reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.