ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Accelerated enumeration of extreme rays through a positive-definite elementarity test.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Partial enumeration of extreme rays in metabolic networks using bit pattern trees.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Individual-based modeling unravels spatial and social interactions in bacterial communities.The ISME journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAnalysis of metabolic networks through extreme rays such as extreme pathways and elementary flux modes has been shown to be effective for many applications. However, due to the combinatorial explosion of candidate vectors, their enumeration is currently limited to small- and medium-scale networks (typically <200 reactions). Partial enumeration of the extreme rays is shown to be possible, but either relies on generating them one-by-one or by implementing a sampling step in the enumeration algorithms. Sampling-based enumeration can be achieved through the canonical basis approach (CBA) or the nullspace approach (NSA). Both algorithms are very efficient in medium-scale networks, but struggle with elementarity testing in sampling-based enumeration of larger networks.
resultsIn this paper, a novel elementarity test is defined and exploited, resulting in significant speedup of the enumeration. Even though NSA is currently considered more effective, the novel elementarity test allows CBA to significantly outpace NSA. This is shown through two case studies, ranging from a medium-scale network to a genome-scale metabolic network with over 600 reactions. In this study, extreme pathways are chosen as the extreme rays, but the novel elementarity test and CBA are equally applicable to the other types. With the increasing complexity of metabolic networks in recent years, CBA with the novel elementarity test shows even more promise as its advantages grows with increased network complexity. Given this scaling aspect, CBA is now the faster method for enumerating extreme rays in genome-scale metabolic networks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All case studies are implemented in Python. The codebase used to generate extreme pathways using the different approaches is available at https://gitlab.kuleuven.be/biotec-plus/pos-def-ep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.