Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705072›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Decades in the Making: The Evolution of Digital Health Research Infrastructure Through Synthetic Data, Common Data Models, and Federated Learning.

Jodie A Austin, Elton H Lobo, Mahnaz Samadbeik, Teyl Engstrom, Reji Philip, Jason D Pole, Clair M Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Precision medicine in mental health: applications, challenges, and recommendations.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jodie A AustinQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-7200
Elton H LoboQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-6318
Mahnaz SamadbeikQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4756-2364
Teyl EngstromQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-5006
Reji PhilipQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-2969-8299
Jason D PoleQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0413-5434
Clair M SullivanQueensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-9989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, medical research is based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for interventions such as drugs and operative procedures. However, increasingly, there is a need for health research to evolve. RCTs are expensive to run, are generally formulated with a single research question in mind, and analyze a limited dataset for a restricted period. Progressively, health decision makers are focusing on real-world data (RWD) to deliver large-scale longitudinal insights that are actionable. RWD are collected as part of routine care in real time using digital health infrastructure. For example, understanding the effectiveness of an intervention could be enhanced by combining evidence from RCTs with RWD, providing insights into long-term outcomes in real-life situations. Clinicians and researchers struggle in the digital era to harness RWD for digital health research in an efficient and ethically and morally appropriate manner. This struggle encompasses challenges such as ensuring data quality, integrating diverse sources, establishing governance policies, ensuring regulatory compliance, developing analytical capabilities, and translating insights into actionable strategies. The same way that drug trials require infrastructure to support their conduct, digital health also necessitates new and disruptive research data infrastructure. Novel methods such as common data models, federated learning, and synthetic data generation are emerging to enhance the utility of research using RWD, which are often siloed across health systems. A continued focus on data privacy and ethical compliance remains. The past 25 years have seen a notable shift from an emphasis on RCTs as the only source of practice-guiding clinical evidence to the inclusion of modern-day methods harnessing RWD. This paper describes the evolution of synthetic data, common data models, and federated learning supported by strong cross-sector collaboration to support digital health research. Lessons learned are offered as a model for other jurisdictions with similar RWD infrastructure requirements.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDigital HealthHumanscommon data modelsdigital health researchfederated learningreal-world datasynthetic datauniversity-industry collaboration

Identifiers

PMID39705072
PMCPMC11699496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.