Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705049›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

Attention moderates the motion silencing effect for dynamic orientation changes in a discrimination task.

Tabea-Maria Haase, Anina N Rich, Iain D Gilchrist, Christopher Kent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tabea-Maria HaaseSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anina N RichMacquarie University Performance and Expertise Research Centre and School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Iain D GilchristSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Christopher KentSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being able to detect changes in our visual environment reliably and quickly is important for many daily tasks. The motion silencing effect describes a decrease in the ability to detect feature changes for faster moving objects compared with stationary or slowly moving objects. One theory is that spatiotemporal receptive field properties in early vision might account for the silencing effect, suggesting that its origins are low-level visual processing. Here, we explore whether spatial attention can modulate motion silencing of orientation changes to gain greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In Experiment 1, we confirm that the motion silencing effect occurs for the discrimination of orientation changes. In Experiment 2, we use a Posner-style cueing paradigm to investigate whether manipulating covert attention modulates motion silencing for orientation. The results show a clear spatial cueing effect: Participants were able to discriminate orientation changes successfully at higher velocities when the cue was valid compared to neutral cues and performance was worst when the cue was invalid. These results show that motion silencing can be modulated by directing spatial attention toward a moving target and provides support for a role for higher level processes, such as attention, in motion silencing of orientation changes.

Indexed as

AttentionCuesMotion PerceptionOrientation, SpatialPhotic StimulationAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleOrientationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39705049
PMCPMC11684489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.