Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705045›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2024

US Tobacco 21 Policies and Potential Mortality Reductions by State.

Jamie Tam, Alyssa Crippen, Abigail Friedman, Jihyoun Jeon, David C Colston, Nancy L Fleischer, Catherine A Vander Woude, Megan A Boelter, Theodore R Holford, David T Levy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jamie TamDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alyssa CrippenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abigail FriedmanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jihyoun JeonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
David C ColstonDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.
Nancy L FleischerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Catherine A Vander WoudeDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Megan A BoelterPreventing Tobacco Addiction Foundation / Tobacco 21.
Theodore R HolfordDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
David T LevyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Rafael MezaIntegrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention, Early Detection and Treatment InterventionsU01CA253858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2020 to 2025
$8.4M
From Biological to Social Processes: Interdisciplinary Training in Life Course ResearchT32HD091058 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT A HUMMER, Amanda L Thompson · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
The Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Health Equity in the United States - MERIT ExtensionR37CA214787 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLEISCHER, NANCY · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
Health and economic impact analysis of a reduced nicotine cigarette policy on vulnerable populationsK01DA056424 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie Pearl Tam · 2022 to 2026
$829k
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214787NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253858NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD091058NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA056424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Research shows that Tobacco 21 (T21) policies with a minimum legal access age for tobacco products of 21 years reduce smoking, yet their impact varies across US states due to differences in smoking behaviors, mortality rates, and policy coverage. Objective: To quantify potential reductions in smoking-attributable mortality associated with Tobacco 21 policies for each of the 50 states and Washington, DC. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Cancer Intervention Surveillance and Modeling Network (CISNET) Tobacco Control Policy Model of smoking was used with detailed state-specific data on smoking initiation, smoking cessation and mortality rates as they vary by age, gender, and birth cohort for 50 US states and the District of Columbia. This was integrated with comprehensive data on T21 policy coverage at the local and state levels from 2005 to 2024, and then T21 policy effects from quasi-experimental studies were applied to simulate each state's experience of T21 policies, quantifying potential mortality reductions from 2005 to 2100. Exposures: Cigarette smoking. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated smoking-attributable deaths averted and life-years gained compared with a baseline scenario. Results: Early statewide T21 adoption in California, combined with its large population, was associated with more than 27 000 premature deaths averted through 2100, whereas statewide implementation in Kentucky was associated with 15 000 averted premature deaths. In Massachusetts, T21 policies were associated with 8000 averted premature deaths, largely attributed to municipal T21 policies covering most residents. Wisconsin-lacking state or local policies-requires enforcement of federal T21 to prevent up to 10 000 premature deaths. Across the country, comprehensive enforcement of federal, state, and local T21 laws were associated with up to 526 000 premature deaths averted and 13.3 million life-years gained by 2100. Enforcement of only state and local policies was associated with 442 000 premature deaths averted. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that early adoption and implementation of T21 policies maximizes potential premature mortality reductions. However, the strength of T21 policies and enforcement varies widely across states. Enforcement of the federal T21 law is critical in the 8 states without state-level T21 cigarette policies of their own.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco ProductsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39705045
PMCPMC11662258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.