Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39705034›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

β-Lactam Inoculum Effect in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infective Endocarditis.

Baptiste Jean, Maelys Crolle, Candice Pollani, Adèle Le Guilloux, Guillaume Martin-Blondel, Pierre Tattevin, Audrey Le Bot, David Luque Paz, François Guérin, Vincent Cattoir and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Study on the Mechanism of Berberine Reversing MRSA Resistance to β-Lactam Antibiotics by Inhibiting blaZ Expression.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Baptiste JeanService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Maelys CrolleLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, CHU de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Candice PollaniLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, CHU de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Adèle Le GuillouxUnité Méthodologie, Data Management, Analyses Statistiques, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1436, Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Guillaume Martin-BlondelService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Pierre TattevinService des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Audrey Le BotService des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
David Luque PazService des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
François GuérinService de Bactériologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Vincent CattoirService de Bactériologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Laurence Armand-LefevreLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Infection, Anti-Microbien, Modélisation, Evolution (IAME), INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Signara GueyeLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Infection, Anti-Microbien, Modélisation, Evolution (IAME), INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
François-Xavier LescureService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Bichat, Université Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Xavier DuvalCentre d'Investigation Clinique, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, INSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1425, Université Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.
Clémence MassipLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, CHU de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Pierre DelobelService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Staphylococcus aureus is associated with high mortality, approximately 20% to 30%, mostly in the first month, with no improvement in recent decades. Current opinion is that antistaphylococcal penicillin and cefazolin are equally effective in treating methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) IE, and both are recommended as possible first-line treatments. Most MSSA strains carry the β-lactamase blaZ gene, and some blaZ-positive strains exhibit an inoculum effect, meaning increased minimum inhibitory concentrations at high inoculum. This reduced susceptibility to an antibiotic at high bacterial inoculum may be particularly relevant in IE, where vegetations have very high bacterial densities. Objective: To evaluate the association between phenotypic characteristics of S aureus isolates, β-lactam used, and outcome in patients with MSSA IE. Design, Settings, and Participants: This retrospective case series included MSSA cases treated at 3 French university hospitals between February 2016 and February 2022. The study included patients who had clinical isolates available and had definite or possible S aureus IE that involved native or prosthetic valves. Data were analyzed from July 2023 to June 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: MSSA isolates were tested for the presence of blaZ and for inoculum effects to cefazolin and oxacillin. The association between first-month mortality and the β-lactam used, the presence of blaZ, and the presence of an inoculum effect to the treatment received was evaluated. Results: This study included 216 patients with MSSA IE (median [IQR] age, 65 [49-73] years; 152 [70.4%] male) who were treated with antistaphylococcal penicillin (139 [64.4%]) or cefazolin (77 [35.6%]). One-month mortality of left-sided IE was 44 of 180 patients (24.4%), with no overall difference between patients treated with antistaphylococcal penicillin or cefazolin. However, 1-month mortality was higher in patients infected with blaZ-positive strains than with blaZ-negative strains (38 of 129 [29.5%] vs 6 of 51 [11.8%]; P = .01), and with strains with an inoculum effect to the β-lactam received than with strains without an inoculum effect (25 of 62 [40.3%] vs 13 of 67 [19.4%]; P = .005). On multivariable analysis, the presence of an inoculum effect was independently associated with first-month mortality (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.28-6.30; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series of MSSA IE, the presence of an inoculum effect to the β-lactam received was a risk factor for death in the first month. Phenotyping MSSA isolates for inoculum effect may guide β-lactam choice and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCefazolinEndocarditis, BacterialStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAgedFemaleHumansMaleMethicillinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedOxacillinRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCefazolinMethicillinOxacillin

Identifiers

PMID39705034
PMCPMC11662251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.