ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Predicting Subject Traits From Brain Spectral Signatures: An Application to Brain Ageing.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifespan brain age prediction based on multiple EEG oscillatory features and sparse group lasso.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- From early to contemporary normative modeling: Mapping individual differences in neurophysiological signals.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prediction of subject traits using brain data is an important goal in neuroscience, with relevant applications in clinical research, as well as in the study of differential psychology and cognition. While previous prediction work has predominantly been done on neuroimaging data, our focus is on electroencephalography (EEG), a relatively inexpensive, widely available and non-invasive data modality. However, EEG data is complex and needs some form of feature extraction for subsequent prediction. This process is sometimes done manually, risking biases and suboptimal decisions. Here we investigate the use of data-driven Kernel methods for prediction from single channels using the EEG spectrogram, which reflects macro-scale neural oscillations in the brain. Specifically, we introduce the idea of reinterpreting the spectrogram of each channel as a probability distribution, so that we can leverage advanced machine learning techniques that can handle probability distributions with mathematical rigour and without the need for manual feature extraction. We explore how the resulting technique, Kernel mean embedding regression, compares to a standard application of Kernel ridge regression as well as to a non-Kernelised approach. Overall, we found that the Kernel methods exhibit improved performance thanks to their capacity to handle nonlinearities in the relation between the EEG spectrogram and the trait of interest. We leveraged this method to predict biological age in a multinational EEG data set, HarMNqEEG, showing the method's capacity to generalise across experiments and acquisition setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.