Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704934›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2024

Determinants of the economic burden of ART on the Italian NHS: insights from the Lombardy region.

Elisabetta Listorti, Aleksandra Torbica, Giovanna Esposito, Matteo Franchi, Fabio Parazzini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabetta ListortiCentre for Healthcare and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy. elisabetta.listorti@sdabocconi.it.
Aleksandra TorbicaCentre for Healthcare and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna EspositoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy.
Matteo FranchiNational Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rising spread of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), it becomes imperative to understand the determinants of resource utilization in ART versus spontaneous pregnancies to enhance policies directed to pregnancy care. The focus of our study is to examine the costs associated with ART from the perspective of the Italian NHS and to investigate in depth the contributing social and clinical factors.Using the healthcare informative system of Lombardy, a Region of Northern Italy, we gathered individual-level information for a cohort of women who experienced either spontaneous pregnancies or pregnancies following ART from 2007 until 2020. The information covered multiple healthcare services, and we used a propensity score matching technique to match couples of ART/No ART women based on a comprehensive set of confounders. We then applied statistical tests and regression models to identify the impact of ART on the reported cost differences.Our cohort was composed of 44652 women and results revealed significantly higher costs for ART pregnancies, especially in terms of hospital admissions (additional 1611€, 95% CI 1558-1666) and drug prescriptions (additional 216 €, CI 95% 204-228) occurring before delivery. In-depth analysis showed for ART pregnancies, i) a higher likelihood of incurring expenses related to complications and ii) higher costs associated with two established clinical practices that lack scientific evidence supporting their efficacy.Our study sheds light on the complex interplay of clinical and social factors influencing the ART burden, emphasizing the importance of tailored support and evidence-based practices in optimizing outcomes and resource allocation.

Indexed as

ARTAssisted reproductive technologiesEconomic burdenHealthcare costsMedically assisted reproductionNational healthcare system

Identifiers

PMID39704934
PMCPMC11662418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.