Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704876›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Cancer-related pain in long-term survivors of oncological diseases: results of a survey on the current care situation.

H Hofbauer, K Kieselbach, S Wirz, A Bundscherer, U M Stamer, F Rapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H Hofbauer *Pain Therapy Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89075, Ulm, Germany. hannes.hofbauer@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-7302
K Kieselbach *Interdisciplinary Pain Center, Medical Center University Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 117, 79016, Freiburg, Germany.
S WirzDepartment for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Medicine, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Centre for Pain Medicine, Weaning Center, University of Bonn, Cura Hospital/GFO-Clinics Bonn, Schuelgenstr. 15, 53604, Bad Honnef, Germany.
A BundschererDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
U M StamerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-2249
F RappPain Therapy Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89075, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe increasing survival rates of oncology patients have led to a corresponding increase in long-time survivors living with chronic cancer-related pain. Data is scarce on the care situation for this distinct clinical entity and on specific therapy requirements, such as interdisciplinary, multimodal pain therapy (IMPT). Our cross-sectional study aimed to assess the current care situation, distinct chronification factors, and optimization potential. This survey addresses this need in Germany, but also provides results with international implications.

methodsVia an online survey, German Pain Society members involved in the treatment of long-time survivors with chronic cancer-related pain assessed the current care situation, chronification factors, specific treatment needs, and the required practitioner's expertise. The German Pain Society's Cancer Pain Working Group created the non-validated questionnaire using the Delphi method.

resultsOne hundred fifty-nine Pain Society members across 70% of Germany's postal regions answered our survey. Respondents (primarily physicians, and 75% with + 6 years of experience) assessed the care situation as worse for chronic cancer-related pain compared to acute pain. Only 10% of the sites provided specific therapy for chronic cancer-related pain (mostly via outpatient treatment). Compared to non-cancer-related pain, additional, cancer-specific chronification factors were assumed, especially at psychological levels, and these need incorporating into therapies. A majority of practitioners recommended cancer-specific IMPT and specific pain expertise for this distinct clinical entity.

conclusionsMembers from the German Pain Society assume that there are relevant deficits in the care of long-term survivors with chronic cancer-related pain. The situation may be assessed differently by other groups, e.g., oncologists, and the data relates to Germany. Nevertheless, considering the raising survival rates, it can be supposed that there is reason to be concerned about an increasing care deficit. Thus, besides expanding the range of available treatment and raising awareness, IMPT with specially trained personnel should be developed to address the care needs of cancer survivors experiencing chronic cancer-related pain.

Indexed as

Cancer PainCancer SurvivorsChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPain ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer-related painHealthcare researchInterdisciplinary multimodal pain therapyLong-term survivorsPain chronification

Identifiers

PMID39704876
PMCPMC11662055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.