ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Efficacy and prognostic factors of anti-PD1 and nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy in advanced melanoma patients resistant to prior ICI treatment.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy for melanoma efficacy, safety and clinical integration in metastatic and adjuvant settings.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating oncolytic adenoviruses into combination cancer therapy: Mechanisms, advances and clinical outlook.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Rechallenge in a Long-Term Melanoma Survivor: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- From Immunobiology to Clinical Application: Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Melanoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Association Between Blood Transfusion and Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma Treated with Nivolumab.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- A Real-World Evaluation of Clinical Prognostic Scores in Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the five-year survival rate for advanced melanoma. However, many patients exhibit resistance to ICI therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and prognostic factors of anti-PD-1 (Group A) and nivolumab-ipilimumab (Group B) therapy in patients with advanced melanoma who were resistant to prior ICI therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with advanced melanoma who had previously shown resistance to ICI therapy. In the Group A (who have previously shown resistance to anti-CTLA-4, n = 28), the objective response rate (ORR) was 42.9%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 53%. In the Group B (previously shown resistance to anti-PD-1, n = 28), the ORR was 17.9%, and the DCR was 25%. The ORR was lower in two subgroups: patients who showed progression or relapse in the the initial radiological assessment of prior ICI therapy (ORR 10.5%) and patients who had previously received ICI in the adjuvant setting (ORR 8.3%). A Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score of 2-3 was a predictor of OS in both groups (Group A: HR 3.789, 95% CI 1.356-10.589, p = 0.011; Group B: HR 4.281, 95% CI 1.490-12.300, p = 0.007) and for PFS in the Group B (HR 3.167, 95% CI 1.062-9.442, p = 0.039). Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated efficacy following resistance to anti-CTLA-4, whereas combination ICI therapy showed lower response rates in patients resistant to anti-PD-1. Further studies are needed to confirm the RMH scores and other prognostic markers and to evaluate subgroups with lower efficacy of nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.