ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024
Splenic flexure mobilization: does body topography matter?
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSplenic flexure mobilization can be technically challenging, and its oncological benefits remain uncertain. This study aims to explore the relationship between patient and clinical characteristics and splenic flexure mobilization time as well as the implications of prolonged splenic flexure mobilization duration.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study includes 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal colorectal cancer surgery between 2013 and 2018. The study analyzed patient characteristics, duration of surgical steps, and postoperative outcomes. Splenic flexure mobilization time was assessed using operation videos, and the impact of patient-related factors on splenic flexure mobilization complexity was examined.
resultsThe study identified significant correlations of higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0086), weight (p = 0.002), and height (p = 0.043) with longer splenic flexure mobilization time. Gender did not significantly influence splenic flexure mobilization duration. Splenic flexure mobilization time was correlated with the durations of other individual surgical steps (Step 1: medial-to-lateral dissection [p = 0.0013], Step 2: pelvic dissection [p = 0.067], Step 3: dissection of white line and mobilization of descending colon [p = 0.0088], Step 5: stapling, resection, extraction of the specimen, and anastomosis [p = 0.04]) and the overall operation time (p < 0.0001). A 10-min cutoff point predicts the total operation time more efficiently than other potential thresholds.
conclusionThis research suggests that patient characteristics including BMI, weight, and height may serve as indicators for prolonged splenic flexure mobilization time in laparoscopic distal colorectal cancer surgery. Longer splenic flexure mobilization durations were correlated with extended durations of other surgical steps. A BMI-based approach to anticipate SFM duration may enhance preoperative planning, potentially aiding in surgical decision-making.
trial registrationE-10840098-772.02-61604 2.2.2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39704824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.