ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Optimization of target grouping in distributive stereotactic radiosurgery using the excel evolutionary solver.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of target grouping in distributive stereotactic radiosurgery using the excel evolutionary solver.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDistributive stereotactic radiosurgery (dSRS) is a form of fractionation where groups of metastases are treated with a full single-fraction dose on different days. The challenge with dSRS is determining optimal target groupings to maximize the distance between targets treated in the same fraction. This study aimed to develop and validate an accessible optimization technique for distributing brain metastases into optimal treatment fractions using a genetic algorithm.
methodsThe Evolutionary Solver in Excel was used to optimize the grouping of target volumes for distributive SRS fractionation. The algorithm's performance was tested using three geometric test cases with known optimal solutions, 400 simulations with randomly distributed target volumes, and clinical data from five GammaKnife patients. The objective function was defined as the sum of average distances between target volumes within each fraction, with constraints ensuring 2-5 targets per fraction, each target being assigned to only one fraction, and a constraint on the minimum distance between any two targets in the same fraction.
resultsThe Evolutionary Solver successfully identified optimal target groupings in all geometric test cases. Compared to random groupings, the mean distance between target volumes increased by 9%, from 68.1 ± 0.8 to 74.2 ± 1.1 mm post-optimization, while the minimum distance between targets increased by 57%, from 24.9 ± 5.9 to 39.1 ± 7.5 mm. In clinical test cases, the mean distances improved from 81.6 ± 11.9 mm for manual target grouping to 85.6 ± 14.5 mm for optimized target grouping. The minimum separation improved from 35.2 ± 14.5 mm with manual grouping to 51.6 ± 14.7 mm with optimized grouping, corresponding to a mean improvement of 16.4 ± 6.1 mm.
conclusionThe Evolutionary Solver in Excel provides a systematic and reproducible method for optimizing distributive target groupings in SRS and enhances spatial separation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.