Trial reportEuropean endodontic journal2024
Application of Three Types of Scaffolds in Pulp Regeneration for Permanent Mature Teeth with Periapical Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in European endodontic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthograde Apical Barrier in Non-Vital Immature Permanent Teeth: A Narrative Review of Clinical Pathways, Procedural Determinants, and Evidence Gaps.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Context-dependent effectiveness of autologous platelet concentrates in regenerative endodontic procedures and periapical surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
- Single-Visit Endodontic Management of a Complex Endo-Periodontal Lesion in an Oncologic Patient with Systemic Comorbidities: A 12-Month Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Biomaterials for Vital Pulp Therapy: Exploring Biological Properties and Dentin Regeneration Mechanisms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Polymer-Based Scaffolds as an Implantable Material in Regenerative Dentistry: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Applications of chitosan in oral health and diseases.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate pulp regeneration by comparing the application of native chitosan-based scaffolds with enzymatically modified chitosan-based scaffolds in mature teeth with apical lesions, using clinical and radiographic assessments.
methodsThe eligibility criteria for this study were participants aged between 15-45 years, free from systemic diseases and with necrotic mature single-rooted teeth with periapical lesions. The teeth were equally and randomly allocated into three groups (1: 1: 1 allocation): Group A received treatment with a Blood Clot (BC) scaffold; Group B with a combination of Native Chitosan and Blood Clot (NCS+BC) scaffold; and Group C with Enzymatically-Modified Chitosan and Blood Clot (EMCS+BC) scaffold. Clinical procedures were performed over two appointments. During the first appointment, canals underwent standardized mechanical and chemical preparation, followed by a modified triple antibiotic paste application, then sealed with glass ionomer cement. After three weeks, the antibiotic paste was removed. Subsequently, the regenerative procedure was conducted based on the group assignment. Participants were monitored at one, three, six-, and twelve months post-treatment to evaluate the treated teeth clinically and radiographically, focusing on the status of periapical lesions and tooth sensibility through cold testing. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests to determine significant differences in healing degrees among the three groups over time. Additionally, the Chi-square test was used to assess significant differences in tooth sensibility frequencies during the cold test across the groups.
resultsThirty teeth from twenty-four participants were included. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of healing degrees among the three studied groups (BC, NCS+BC, EMCS+BC) after one, three, and twelve months. The degree of healing after six months in the EMCS+BC group was higher than in other groups, and there were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of healing degrees after six months between the NCS+BC group and BC group. The frequencies of tooth sensibility in the cold test among the three studied groups (BC, NCS+BC, EMCS+BC) were significantly different after six and twelve months. The tooth sensibility in the BC group was smaller than that of both the NCS+BC group and EMCS+BC group, and there were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of tooth sensibility between the NCS+BC group and EMCS+BC group.
conclusionThe application of the EMCS+BC scaffold demonstrates superior outcomes in pulp regeneration after six months, with a higher degree of healing observed compared to the NCS+BC and BC groups. There were no statistically significant differences at one month, three months, and twelve months. Additionally, tooth sensitivity was more pronounced in the EMCS+BC and NCS+BC groups. (EEJ-2024- 08-132).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.