ArticleClinical practice and cases in emergency medicine2024
RUSH to the Diagnosis: Identifying Occult Pathology in Hypotensive Patients.
Article in Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
case presentationA 63-year-old female presented to our emergency department with altered mental status and hypotension. She was transferred from the outpatient interventional radiology suite after becoming unresponsive during the removal of an inferior vena cava filter. The patient arrived somnolent with no other history available. Her physical exam was unremarkable. We used point-of-care-ultrasound to perform a rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension (RUSH) exam. A large pericardial effusion along with signs of cardiac tamponade were identified. The cardiothoracic surgery team was notified, and the patient was taken to the operating room where pericardial blood and a large hematoma were evacuated. She recovered uneventfully and was discharged one week later. DISCUSSION: The above case describes a very unstable patient whose diagnosis was obtained using the RUSH exam. History and physical did not point to a clear etiology. Options were very limited. She was too unstable to go for computed tomography, and other tests such as electrocardiogram, chest radiograph, and lab work would have been non-diagnostic. It was only after the cardiac view of the RUSH exam was obtained that a pericardial effusion and developing tamponade were identified, facilitating timely management. The RUSH exam, like the extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma, is used to help determine pathologies that need immediate intervention. Incorporation in the evaluation of critically ill patients reduces the time to diagnosis. Our case is a unique example of how point-of-care ultrasound can be used to urgently identify a life-threatening pathology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.