Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704536›Full record

ArticlemSphere2025

Not all is lost: resilience of microbiome samples to freezer failures and long-term storage.

M Fabiola Pulido Barriga, James W J Randolph, Sydney I Glassman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How long should we keep clinical isolates involved in bone and joint infections in microbiology laboratories?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Fabiola Pulido BarrigaDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-812X
James W J RandolphDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Sydney I GlassmanDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9115-3026

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture-NIFA 2022-67014-36675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in technology have facilitated extensive sample collection to explore microbiomes across diverse systems, leading to a growing reliance on ultracold freezers for storing both samples and extracted DNA. However, freezer malfunctions can jeopardize data integrity. To evaluate the impact of an unexpected -80°C freezer failure and the recoverability of thawed soil samples, we extracted DNA and compared it to long-term DNA stored at -20°C and original 16S and ITS2 sequencing data collected before the malfunction. Using Illumina MiSeq, we assessed how the freezer failure and long-term storage influenced the resilience of bacterial or fungal richness or community composition and our ability to accurately determine experimental treatment effects. Our results reveal substantial resilience in fungal richness and both bacterial and fungal beta-diversity to soil sample thawing and extended frozen DNA storage. This resilience facilitated biological inferences that closely mirrored those observed in the original study. Notably, fungi exhibited greater resilience to short-term thawing compared to bacteria, which showed sensitivity to both thawing and long-term freezing. Moreover, taxonomic composition analysis revealed the persistence of dominant microbial taxa under thawing and prolonged freezing, suggesting that dominant microbes remain viable for tracking across temporal studies. In conclusion, our study highlights that beta-diversity is more robust than alpha-diversity and fungi are more resilient to freezer failure than bacteria. Furthermore, our findings underscore the effectiveness of soil storage at -80°C compared to storage of extracted DNA at -20°C, despite potential freezer failures, as the most robust method for long-term storage in microbiome studies. IMPORTANCE: Microbiome studies heavily rely on ultracold freezers for sample storage. Unfortunately, these freezers are prone to frequent malfunctions, resulting in the loss of invaluable samples at laboratories worldwide. Such losses can halt research progress due to potential issues with sample reliability. Our research demonstrates that not all is lost when an unforeseen freezer failure occurs. Samples can still be reliably used to assess treatment effects, which is particularly important for long-term temporal studies where samples cannot be readily obtained again.

Indexed as

BacteriaFreezingFungiMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologySpecimen HandlingDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SbacteriacompositionDNA storagefreezer melt downfrozen DNAfungirichnesssoil thawing

Identifiers

PMID39704536
PMCPMC11774026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.