Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704521›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025

Utility of digital images captured after 4 h of incubation on a microbiology laboratory automation system in guiding the work-up of subcultures from positive blood cultures.

Melvilí Cintrón, Brenden Clark, Edwin Miranda, N Esther Babady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melvilí CintrónClinical Microbiology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2053-2541
Brenden ClarkClinical Microbiology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Edwin MirandaClinical Microbiology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
N Esther BabadyClinical Microbiology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4399-1249

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial workup [e.g., identification (ID) and/or antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)] of bacterial growth on solid media traditionally occurs 16-24 h after sub-culturing of positive blood cultures (BC). Early ID and AST can be facilitated by reviewing digital images captured using a Microbiology Laboratory Automation (MLA) system. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of images captured at 4 h on the WASPLab MLA system for rapid bacterial ID and AST. Retrospective review of all positive BCs results between 1 January 2021 and 31 July 2022 was performed. WASPLab App data were extracted to determine the decision (e.g., perform ID and/or AST or re-incubate plates) made from the 4 h image. Culture results were extracted from the laboratory information system (LIS). A total of 6,845 BCs flagged positive during the study period. The 4 h images for 1,476 cultures (21.6%) were reviewed: 1,200 cultures were re-incubated due to insufficient growth and 276 cultures (4.0%) were sent for ID and/or AST. ID by mass spectrometry was in 100% agreement with that of the molecular BC identification panels. Overall categorical agreement between AST results from the 4 h and overnight growth was 98%. The 4 h images for the remaining 5,369 cultures (78.4%) were not available for review during the day shift. Implementing early reading times for BCs on MLA allows for rapid and accurate ID and AST results. However, optimization of the reading schedule to align with the laboratory's operation schedule is key to realizing the full potential of early reading times. IMPORTANCE: In recent years, an increasing number of clinical microbiology laboratories have adopted laboratory automation for processing and incubation of specimens submitted for bacterial culture. At our institution, we implemented the Copan WASPLab in 2018 for all cultures, including positive blood cultures. Given that positive blood cultures start with a higher biomass of organisms, the first image capture was set up to occur after 4 h of incubation. In this study, we investigated the utility of this early 4 h image by capturing and calculating the percentage of useful actions taken based on growth identified on the image and the yield of both new identification by MALDI-TOF MS and valid and accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results. We found that while the 4-hour time point provided accurate, early identification and AST results, the overall yield was minimal. From a practical standpoint, this review prompted us to discontinue capture and review of this time point. While our staffing model is likely responsible for this low yield, we hope that our experience would help other laboratories decide how to implement WASPLab workflow for positive blood cultures. Thus, we believe that this information will be of interest to the readers of JCM.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryBacteremiaBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesBlood CultureImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesTime Factorsbloodstream infectionsmicrobiology laboratory automationrapid identification

Identifiers

PMID39704521
PMCPMC11837544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.