Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704520›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025

Comparative performances of the Qvella FAST system and conventional methods for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on monomicrobial positive blood cultures.

Malo Penven, Manon Louazon, Charlotte Freret, Alexandra Sauron, Meghane Pilard, Elisa Creignou, Ophélie Gardan, Maryne Haumont, Asma Zouari, Stéphane Lorre and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Requirements for the rational use of antibiotics based on antibiotic stewardship].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Malo PenvenDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8190-7784
Manon LouazonDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Charlotte FreretDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Alexandra SauronDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Meghane PilardDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Elisa CreignouDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Ophélie GardanDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Maryne HaumontDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Asma ZouariNational Reference Center for Antimicrobial Resistance (lab 'Enterococci'), Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Stéphane LorreDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Vincent CattoirDepartment of Bacteriology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-9912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is of paramount importance to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The Qvella FAST System is a new instrument that concentrates and purifies bacteria from positive-flagged blood culture bottles (PFBCBs) to produce a "liquid" colony comparable to a subcultured colony in less than 40 min for rapid ID and calibrated antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In this study, we evaluated performances of the FAST System workflow and our rapid routine manual workflow (bacterial pellet obtained after lysis, cleaning, washing, and centrifugation for ID; AST by disc diffusion by direct inoculation after dilution) by comparison to the reference method based on 24-h bacterial subcultures. Two panels of PFBCBs were studied: panel A (including 107 prospective BCs from septic patients, October-November 2022) and panel B (including 102 BCs spiked with difficult-to-identify bacteria [mostly streptococci] and multidrug-resistant isolates), resulting in a total of 209 evaluable samples. The FAST System provided a correct ID to the species level in 178/209 (85.2%) of cases. For AST, the categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System was 99.4%, with rates of very major (VME), major (ME), and minor (mE) errors of 0.59%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. Our rapid routine workflow based on manual methods show similar results for ID (86.2%) and AST (CA, 99.6%; VME, 0.50%; ME, 0.16%; mE, 0.13%). In conclusion, the Qvella FAST system, a promising tool that can reduce diagnostic time by approximately 1 day, shows excellent performances for rapid ID and AST.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaBlood CultureSepsisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsASTbacteremiaBCbloodstream infectionBSIIDrapid diagnosissepsis

Identifiers

PMID39704520
PMCPMC11837511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.