ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Influenza vaccine effectiveness against medically-attended influenza infection in 2023/24 season in Hangzhou, China.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a trivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (Tri Fluvac) in Thailand: a phase IV test-negative case-control study.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine in Wuhan, China During the 2024-2025 Season: A Test-Negative Case-Control Study.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Rapid aging of influenza epidemics in China from 2005/06 to 2016/17: A population-based study.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From 2020, influenza viruses circulation was largely affected by the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, notably leading to the extinction of the B/Yamagata lineage and raising questions about the relevance of the quadrivalent influenza vaccine, which includes this lineage. Evaluating vaccine effectiveness (VE) against influenza infections is important to inform future vaccine programs. A test-negative case-control study was conducted in five tertiary hospitals in Hangzhou, the capital city of Zhejiang province, China, enrolling medically-attended patients aged >6 months who presented with influenza-like illness (ILI) from October 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The VE was estimated using multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for sex, age, influenza detection methods, and influenza testing timing. Of the 157,291 medically-attended ILI participants enrolled 56,704 (36%) tested positive for influenza. Adjusted overall VE against any medically-attended influenza infection was 48% (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 46%-51%). The overall VE of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) was 59% (95% CI: 50%-66%), followed by the trivalent live attenuated vaccine (LAIV3) (VE = 53%, 95% CI: 42%-62%) and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) (VE = 47%, 95% CI: 45%-50%). IIV3 provided even better protection against medically-attended influenza B infection than IIV4 (VE = 87%, 95% CI: 81%-92% for IIV3 versus VE = 53%, 95% CI: 50%-57% for IIV4). In the 2023/24 season in Hangzhou, China, the influenza vaccine offered moderate protection during a major epidemic. The results supported the World Health Organization recommendation to exclude the B/Yamagata lineage antigen in quadrivalent influenza vaccines in 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.