ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2024
Impact of solution-focused brief therapy and vacuum sealing drainage on mental health of wound care patients.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy on cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving mental health is crucial for patients who require wound treatment.
aimTo analyze the effects of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) combined with vacuum sealing drainage on the psychological health of patients undergoing wound treatment, providing a basis for selecting wound treatment protocols.
methodsA total of 102 patients undergoing wound treatment were included, with the study period from March 2020 to March 2024. Sex was not a factor, and patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 51 cases each. The control group received negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), while the experimental group received NPWT plus SFBT. The recovery of wounds, granulation tissue scores, and psychological health levels were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Windows software version 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0.
resultsPost-treatment, the levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and lactate dehydrogenase in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (
conclusionThe combination of SFBT and NPWT accelerates wound healing, promotes granulation tissue growth, and improves psychological well-being, making it a valuable approach for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.