Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704301›Full record

Trial reportPhysical therapy2024

Improving Function in Older Adults With Hospital-Associated Deconditioning: Lessons Learned Comparing a Randomized Controlled Trial to Real World Practice.

Alexander J Garbin, Melissa K Tran, Jeremy Graber, Danielle Derlein, Deborah Currier, Rebecca Altic, Robert Will, Ethan Cumbler, Jeri E Forster, Kathleen K Mangione and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physical therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander J GarbinEastern Colorado VA Health Care System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-3417
Melissa K TranPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Jeremy GraberEastern Colorado VA Health Care System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-7780
Danielle DerleinPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Deborah CurrierPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Rebecca AlticPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Robert WillPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Ethan CumblerDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Jeri E ForsterDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Anschutz School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Kathleen K MangioneDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, United States.
Jennifer E Stevens-LapsleyEastern Colorado VA Health Care System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-378X

Funding

University of Colorado Aging Training GrantT32AG000279 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Kerrie Moreau · 2001 to 2026
$10.1M
Progressing Home Health Rehabilitation Paradigms for Older AdultsR01NR016209 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STEVENS-LAPSLEY, JENNIFER E. · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
National Institute on Nursing Research and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development R01NR016209NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000279NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe optimal approach for improving physical function following acute hospitalization is unknown. A recent clinical trial of home health physical therapy compared a high-intensity, progressive, multi-component (PMC) intervention to enhanced usual care (EUC). While both groups improved in physical function, no between-group differences were observed. However, the EUC group received care that differed from real world practice due to standardized treatments and a higher frequency of visits. This study compared a non-randomized true usual care (TUC) group to the EUC and PMC groups.

methodsParticipants in the parent trial were randomly assigned to the EUC group (n = 100) and PMC group (n = 100) following hospital discharge. A subset of eligible patients (n = 55) were concurrently enrolled in the TUC group. Both the PMC and EUC groups received strength, activities of daily living, and gait training that differed in intensity but were matched in frequency and duration. TUC group care was determined by the home health agency. The primary outcome at 60-days was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

resultsIn comparison to the TUC group, the EUC and PMC groups had significantly greater improvements in SPPB score (EUC: +1.04 points [CI = 0.18-1.90]; PMC: +1.12 points [CI = 0.23-2.00]).

conclusionWhile participants in the EUC and PMC groups experienced greater functional recovery compared to those in the TUC group, it cannot be determined whether these differences are due to the interventions received or confounding factors associated with the addition of a third, non-randomized, study group during the trial period. IMPACT: This study illustrates the importance of design and interpretation of control groups for clinical trials. Further, the differences between the TUC group and the enhanced intervention groups warrant future research exploring whether increasing visits and standardizing care improve function in older adults receiving home health physical therapy after hospital associated deconditioning. LAY SUMMARY: Participants in the intervention groups received standardized and more therapy than usual care, and experienced greater functional improvements. However, these differences may be due to factors associated with the addition of a non-randomized group during an ongoing clinical trial.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFemaleGaitHome Care ServicesHospitalizationHumansMalePhysical Therapy ModalitiesControl GroupEnhanced Usual CareFunctionGeriatricsHigh Intensity ExerciseHome HealthTrue Usual Care

Identifiers

PMID39704301
PMCPMC13396840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.