Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704284›Full record

ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Air versus supplemental oxygen for resuscitation of term or late preterm infants at birth.

Christoph M Rüegger, Jennifer A Dawson, Jane Cracknell, Michelle Fiander, Peter G Davis, Vincent D Gaertner

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph M RüeggerNewborn Research, Department of Neonatology, University Hospital and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jennifer A DawsonNewborn Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jane CracknellCochrane Neonatal, Vermont Oxford Network, Oxford, UK.
Michelle FianderCochrane Neonatal Group, Halifax, Canada.
Peter G DavisMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Vincent D GaertnerDivision of Neonatology, Dr. von Hauner'sches Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective To assess the benefits and harms of air compared with supplemental oxygen for resuscitation of term or late preterm infants at birth in reducing rates of mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Secondary objectives To assess whether the benefits and harms of air compared with supplemental oxygen differ according to different oxygen concentrations, gestational age (GA), whether oxygen was titrated to saturation curves and the income of the study country.

Indexed as

AirInfant, PrematureOxygen Inhalation TherapyResuscitationGestational AgeHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornNeurodevelopmental DisordersOxygenRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicTerm BirthOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39704284
PMCPMC11660226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.