Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704260›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Efficacy and safety of a 72-h infusion of prostacyclin (1 ng/kg/min) in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection and endotheliopathy-protocol for the multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, investigator-initiated COMBAT-ARF trial.

Peter Søe-Jensen, Niels E Clausen, Morten H Bestle, Lars P K Andersen, Theis Lange, Pär I Johansson, Jakob Stensballe

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter Søe-JensenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels E ClausenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten H BestleDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Lars P K AndersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Theis LangeSection of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pär I JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-5964
Jakob StensballeCAG Center for Endotheliomics, Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Alfred Benzon FoundationNovo Nordisk Fonden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute respiratory failure (ARF) is common in critically ill patients, and 50% of patients in intensive care units require mechanical ventilation [3, 4]. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed that COVID-19 infection induced ARF caused by damage to the microvascular pulmonary endothelium. In a randomized clinical trial, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with severe endotheliopathy, as defined by soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) ≥ 4 ng/mL, were randomized to evaluate the effect of a 72-h infusion of low-dose prostacyclin 1 ng/kg/min or placebo. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 21.9% versus 43.6% in the prostacyclin and the placebo groups, respectively (RR 0.50; CI 0.24 to 0.96 p = .06). The aim of the current trial is to investigate if this beneficial effect and safety of prostacyclin also are present in any patient with suspected pulmonary infection requiring mechanical ventilation and concomitant severe endotheliopathy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a multi-center, randomized, blinded, clinical investigator-initiated phase 3 trial in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pulmonary infection and severe endotheliopathy, as defined by sTM ≥4 ng/mL. Patients are randomized 1:1 to a 72-h infusion of low-dose prostacyclin (iloprost) 1 ng/kg/min or placebo (an equal volume of saline). Four-hundred fifty patients will be included. The primary endpoint is 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints include 90-day mortality, days alive without vasopressor, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy in the ICU within 28 and 90 days, and the number of serious adverse reactions or serious adverse events within the first 7 days. DISCUSSION: This trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of prostacyclin vs. placebo for 72-hours in mechanically ventilated patients with any suspected pulmonary infection and severe endotheliopathy, as defined by sTM ≥4 ng/mL. Trial endpoints focus on the potential effect of prostacyclin to reduce 28-day all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpoprostenolRespiration, ArtificialClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory InsufficiencyThrombomodulinEpoprostenolThrombomodulinacute respiratory failureclinical trialinfectious pulmonary endotheliopathymechanical ventilationprostacyclinthrombomodulin

Identifiers

PMID39704260
PMCPMC11660193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.