ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2025
[Corrigendum] Abnormal expression of SIRTs in psoriasis: Decreased expression of SIRT 1‑5 and increased expression of SIRT 6 and 7.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- NOTCH-mediated glial CXCL9:SPP1 polarization by GSK3β exacerbates postnatal enteric nervous system dysfunction in Hirschsprung disease.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The role of immune cell crosstalk and signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Echinacoside ameliorates bleomycin-induced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by regulating macrophage polarization.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- The Combination of PF-543 and TRAIL Effectively Induces Apoptotic Cell Death and Inhibits Stem Cell-Like Properties Through the SPHK1/S1PR1/STAT3 Pathway in TRAIL-Resistant Colorectal Cancer Cells.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of the above article, the authors contacted the Editorial Office to explain that three pairs of the western blots featured in Fig. 4 on p. 165 had inadvertently been duplicated in this figure. Essentially, it appeared to the authors that the blots in Fig. 4A for SIRT5 were identical to those in Fig. 4C for SIRT6 (P2 versus C2); the blots in Fig. 4B for SIRT4 were identical to those in the same figure part for SIRT5; and the blots in Fig. 4C for SIRT6 (P3 versus C3) were identical to those in Fig. 4C for SIRT7 (P1 versus C1). The authors were able to re‑examine their original data, and identified the data that should have rightfully been included in this figure. The revised version of Fig. 4, now incorporating the correct data for SIRT6 (P2 versus C2) in Fig. 4C, SIRT5 in Fig. 4B, and SIRT7 (P1 versus C1) in Fig. 4C, is shown on the next page. The authors can confirm that the errors associated with this figure did not have a significant impact on either the results or the conclusions reported in this study, and all the authors agree with the publication of this Corrigendum. The authors are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.