Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Galactooligosaccharide Administered In Ovo on Hatchability, Chick Quality, Performance, Caecal Histomorphology and Meat Quality Traits of Broiler Chickens.

M Mangan, P Reszka, K Połtowicz, M Siwek

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M ManganDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology (PBS), Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-3444

P ReszkaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Physiotherapy and Nutrition, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology (PBS), Bydgoszcz, Poland.

K PołtowiczDepartment of Poultry Breeding, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice, Poland.

M SiwekDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology (PBS), Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

This study was supported by H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions and subsidy from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education research project: BN-WHiBZ-0/2022.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presented study explored the promising alternatives of in ovo injection with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP) and galactooligosaccharide (GOS) in the poultry industry. The study aimed to assess the effects of probiotic and prebiotic on various aspects of poultry production. The study involved 300 Ross broiler eggs, individually candled on Day 7 of embryonic development. The eggs were sorted into four groups: negative control (no injection), positive control (0.9% physiological saline injection), GOS 3.5 mg/egg and LP 1 × 10

Indexed as

CecumChickensLactiplantibacillus plantarumMeatOligosaccharidesProbioticsAnimalsChick EmbryoOvumOligosaccharideschick qualitygut healthin ovo technologypost‐hatch performanceprebioticprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID39704044

DOI10.1111/jpn.14082

PMCPMC12091084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.