ArticleJournal of nutritional science2024
Testing a proposed mathematical model of weight loss in women enrolled on a commercial weight-loss programme: the LighterLife study.
Article in Journal of nutritional science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weight loss results in obligatory reductions in energy expenditure (EE) due to loss of metabolically active fat-free mass (FFM). This is accompanied by adaptive reductions (i.e. adaptive thermogenesis) designed to restore energy balance while in an energy crisis. While the '3500-kcal rule' is used to advise weight loss in clinical practice, the assumption that EE remains constant during energy restriction results in a large overestimation of weight loss. Thus, this work proposes a novel method of weight-loss prediction to more accurately account for the dynamic trajectory of EE. A mathematical model of weight loss was developed using ordinary differential equations relying on simple self-reported inputs of weight and energy intake to predict weight loss over a specified time. The model subdivides total daily EE into resting EE, physical activity EE, and diet-induced thermogenesis, modelling obligatory and adaptive changes in each compartment independently. The proposed model was tested and refined using commercial weight-loss data from participants enrolled on a very low-energy total-diet replacement programme (LighterLife UK, Essex). Mathematical modelling predicted post-intervention weight loss within 0.75% (1.07 kg) of that observed in females with overweight or obesity. Short-term weight loss was consistently underestimated, likely due to considerable FFM reductions reported on the onset of weight loss. The best model agreement was observed from 6 to 9 weeks where the predicted end-weight was within 0.35 kg of that observed. The proposed mathematical model simulated rapid weight loss with reasonable accuracy. Incorporated terms for energy partitioning and adaptive thermogenesis allow us to easily account for dynamic changes in EE, supporting the potential use of such a model in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.