Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Exploring the influence of urban art interventions on attraction and wellbeing: an empirical field experiment.

Margot Dehove, Jan Mikuni, Nikita Podolin, Martin Karl Moser, Bernd Resch, Linda Doerrzapf, Pia Marlena Boehm, Katharina Prager, Helmut Leder, Elisabeth Oberzaucher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Margot DehoveVienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jan MikuniVienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nikita PodolinVienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin Karl MoserDepartment of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Bernd ReschDepartment of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Linda DoerrzapfResearch Unit Transportation System Planning, Institute of Spatial Planning, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Pia Marlena BoehmFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina PragerDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut LederVienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth OberzaucherVienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While cities are attractive places, brimming with opportunities and possibilities for their inhabitants, they have also been found to have negative consequences, especially on physical and mental health. In a world of ever-growing urban populations, it is important to understand how to make cities healthier and more pleasant places to live. In the present study, we investigated the impact of art as an urban intervention and compared it to the well-known effects of greenery (i.e., plants and vegetation) in an identically framed intervention. Specifically, we looked at how people engage with a Graetzloase (a type of parklet) and its embedding urban environment in terms of visual and spatial attraction as well as wellbeing. The Graetzloase displayed either abstract art or greenery and was placed on two distinct streets that, among other elements, also contained art and greenery. Our field study captured the ongoing experiences during people's exploration of the urban environment by employing mobile eye-trackers and physiological devices. While our findings demonstrated a certain level of visual and spatial attraction towards the Graetzloases, it was not as pronounced as initially anticipated. Nevertheless, our analyses still inform on

Indexed as

aesthetic evaluationfield experimentmobile eye-trackingstreeturban designurban intervention artwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID39703874
PMCPMC11656315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.