ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Prognostic value of the HALP score in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis combined with time to castration resistance.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel "early warning" system for biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer: development and validation of the SII-HALP combined score.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Integrating Tumor Biology and Host Factors in mCRPC: The Prognostic Value of 'Time to Castration Resistance', Systemic Inflammation, and Comorbidity Burden in Patients Treated with Enzalutamide.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of composite inflammatory indices for predicting prostate cancer risk and mortality: a NHANES-based study with external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the combination of HALP score with TTCR score on OS and PFS in PC patients who developed castration resistance. Patients and methods: The study enrolled 152 patients with metastatic disease who had received either ARTAs or docetaxel as first-line treatment. The median cut-off was 30.83 months for the HALP score and 16.1 months for TTCR determined by ROC analysis. Based on these cut-off values, patients were categorized into low-high HALP score and TTCR <16.1 months-TTCR ≥16.1 months groups. The combination of HALP score and TTCR was then stratified by risk into three new groups: Factor 0, Factor 1, and Factor 2. Results: PFS was significantly shorter in the TTCR <16.1 months group compared to the TTCR ≥16.1 months group, as well as in the low-HALP score group compared to the high-HALP score group. Furthermore, as the number of factors increased, a significant increase in OS and PFS was observed in the groups formed by the combination of HALP score and TTCR. Conclusion: We have validated the predictive capability of combining low HALP score (<30.38) and short TTCR (<16.1 months) parameters in estimating the OS and PFS durations of mCRPC patients, both recognized as unfavorable prognostic indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.