ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Cutaneous adverse events due to checkpoint inhibitors - a retrospective analysis at a tertiary referral hospital in Switzerland 2019-2022.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sarcoid-like Reactions in Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Pembrolizumab.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Post-oncologic skin health: cutaneous recovery and rehabilitation after cancer treatments.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly important in anti-cancer treatment. Therefore, knowledge of immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ir-cAE) is crucial for therapy management and continuation. Objective: The study aimed to analyze the incidence of cutaneous adverse events caused by checkpoint inhibitor therapy, including their clinical presentation, management, and impact on further treatment. Methods: This is a descriptive, monocentric retrospective study that uses data from the electronic health record system at a tertiary referral hospital in Central Switzerland from September 2019 to September 2022. The electronic health records of patients who received a therapy with checkpoint inhibitors were examined for age, sex, type of immunotherapy, time to occurrence of ir-cAEs, characteristics of the ir-cAEs, the treatment approach, and the continuation or cessation of the therapy due to ir-cAEs. Results: Out of 431 patients, for 131 patients (30.4%) at least one ir-cAE event was documented. In particular, 109 (25.3%) experienced pruritus and 61 (14.2%) showed a maculopapular exanthema. The severity of the ir-cAE was mild in 88 patients (67.2% out of those with ir-cAEs). Ir-cAE were observed in 10 out of 20 patients (50%) treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and in 15 out of 24 (62.5%) treated with durvalumab. In 15 patients (3.5%), checkpoint inhibitor therapy had to be discontinued due to cutaneous side effects. Conclusions: This study showed that approximately one third of the patients experienced ir-cAEs. The most frequently observed ir-cAEs were pruritus, maculopapular exanthema and xerosis cutis. In general, the dermatological manifestations are mild and responsive to topical treatment or self-limiting with no requirement for treatment interruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.