ReviewJB & JS open access
Beyond Single Accreditation: Exploring Factors Influencing Selection of Osteopathic Medical Students in the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate DO orthopaedic surgery residents compared with their MD counterparts in traditionally allopathic programs, assessing research productivity, number of departmental DO faculty and alumni, and geographical ties to the residency program. Methods: The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to retrospectively identify traditionally allopathic ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs for the 2023 to 2024 year. Residency program websites Scopus, PubMed, and Doximity were used to collect data. Results: A total of 150 orthopedic surgery residency programs were identified, with 3,712 residents. Of these residents, 58 (1.6%) were DOs and 3,654 (98.4%) were MDs. MDs had a median H-index of 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-4) and median 4 publications (IQR 2-10), whereas DOs had a median H-index of 0 (IQR 0-1) and median 1 publication (IQR 1-3). Sixty-one programs (40%) had DO faculty (138), with 65% (38) matching at a program with ≥1 DO faculty member (20 programs; 13.3%). Conclusions: Despite a unified accreditation system, this study demonstrates that orthopaedic surgery continues to favor allopathic applicants, with 1.6% of traditionally allopathic program residents being DOs. The presence of DO faculty, alumni, or residents in a program does not significantly impact DO match rates, emphasizing the multifactorial nature of resident selection. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for addressing selection biases and promoting equity in orthopaedic surgery resident selection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.