ArticleImmunotherapy advances2024
Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations in adults.
Article in Immunotherapy advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 bivalent booster vaccines in US nursing home residents.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Ethics as if Your Life Depended on It.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026Article
- Influenza.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- mRNA delivery of mosaic-8 pan-sarbecovirus RBD vaccines elicits distinct antibody epitope signatures.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Programmable lipid nanoparticles for RNA therapeutics: Design principles and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on healthy aging and functionality in older Mexican adults: insights from the MHAS cohort.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
- Retrospective neutralization analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants in early pandemic sera.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- mRNA delivery of genetically encoded mosaic-8 pan-sarbecovirus RBD vaccines.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Future of mRNA Platforms: Strategic Pause or Premature Pivot?Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Biomarkers of mRNA vaccine efficacy derived from mechanistic modeling of tumor-immune interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- No Evidence of Direct Activation of Human Neutrophil Responses by Multivalent Prefusion Trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike ProteinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- No evidence of direct activation of human neutrophil responses by multivalent prefusion trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein ex vivo.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2, and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines were central to the global pandemic control measures. Methods: Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE). Our study focussed on those that reported the efficacy of these vaccines against COVID-19 hospitalization. Hospitalization was chosen as the primary outcome as it directly reflects the ability of the vaccine to prevent severe disease. A literature search was undertaken using Medline and Embase on 25 February 2024. From this, 50 studies out of 18,347 articles were included for further analysis. Results: High VE against hospitalization was reported for both the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines when used either as a primary vaccination series (2-dose) or following an additional booster dose (3-dose). Meta-analysis indicated that the pooled VE estimates for each of these vaccination protocols ranged from 84% to 86%, suggesting strong protectiveness. Our data also imply that booster doses can restore waning effectiveness, with no significant differences observed in VE between the 2-dose and 3-dose protocols. However, subgroup analysis revealed an association between the presence of the Omicron variant and a drop in VE, indicating that future emerging SARS-CoV-2 virus variants could similarly affect VE. Conclusions: Our review underscores the importance of ongoing research to ensure vaccine strategies remain effective against evolving variants. Our study also identified the need for expanding data collection to include underrepresented populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.