Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703774›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2024

Incidence of antibody-drug conjugate-related hepatotoxicity in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ping Yang, Hengheng Zhang, Jinming Li, Zitao Li, Zhen Liu, Miaozhou Wang, Fuxing Zhao, Jiuda Zhao, GuoShuang Shen, Yi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Pharmacovigilance study and development of a clinical decision flowchart for personalized selection of trastuzumab, T-DXd, and T-DM1 in breast cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Navigating liver toxicity in the age of novel oncological agents.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ping YangQinghai University, Xining, China.
Hengheng ZhangQinghai University, Xining, China.
Jinming LiThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Zitao LiThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Zhen LiuThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Miaozhou WangThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Fuxing ZhaoThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Jiuda ZhaoThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
GuoShuang ShenThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Yi ZhaoThe Center of Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, No. 29 Tongren Road, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-6048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), as a new type of targeted drug, have been widely used in breast cancer patients in recent years. However, while achieving better efficacy, its hepatotoxicity should not be ignored. Objectives: To clarify the incidence of hepatotoxicity associated with ADCs and compare the incidence of hepatotoxicity of ADCs with different drugs. Design: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the clinical trials and combined the data using meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to March 12, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of ADC-related hepatotoxicity in breast cancer patients. The data were merged using Stata 17.0 software. Results: ADCs caused a high incidence of all grades of hepatotoxicity. Sacituzumab govitecan caused the highest incidence of all grades of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation at 25.30% (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.29-31.82). Trastuzumab deruxtecan caused the highest incidence of all grades of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation. The highest incidence of AST elevation was 31.89% (95% CI: 18.56-46.85). Conversely, trastuzumab emtansine caused the highest incidence of grade ⩾3 AST and ALT elevation (incidence rates were 3.95% (95% CI: 2.39-5.85) and 3.42% (95% CI: 1.95-5.24), respectively). Conclusion: Hepatotoxicity is an adverse reaction that cannot be ignored when ADCs are used for treating breast cancer. Moreover, clinicians should pay more attention to the assessment of patients' liver function and monitoring of liver indices, particularly ALT and AST, when using ADCs.

Indexed as

antibody–drug conjugatesbreast cancerhepatotoxicitymeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID39703774
PMCPMC11656431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.