ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Burnout in Practicing Neurologists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sound relief: Restorative Music as a strategy to improve clinician wellbeing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Behavioral barriers in the management of spinal muscular atrophy: The role of procrastination, regret, and burnout.PloS one · 2026Article
- Burnout and career satisfaction in neurology.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Harnessing the Neurobiology of Empathy and Compassion to Alleviate Burnout in Neurology.Annals of neurology · 2026Review
- How to Prevent Suicide in Older Patients with a Neurocognitive Disorder: A Scoping Review Leading to the Development of a Clinical Guide for Healthcare Workers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI-generated neurology consultation summaries improve efficiency and reduce documentation burden in the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Faculty Perspectives on Appreciation Strategies in a Neurology Department.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Work-related stressful events and burnout experienced by residents and specialists in German neurology: prevalence, causes, and coping strategies derived from a nationwide survey.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Neurologists' Openness to Evidence-Based Innovation in Multiple Sclerosis Care: Individual and Structural Determinants.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
- How do neurologists perceive the organization and functioning of multiple sclerosis care units?Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Burnout is a context-dependent, global issue among physicians in the medical field who often face job-related stressors, high workloads, and limited or lack of social support or autonomy. Within medicine, neurology is a specialty with high levels of burnout and low levels of work-life satisfaction. We, therefore, conducted this study to evaluate burnout rates among neurologists globally and identify the tools used to evaluate it. Recent Findings: Among the 14 articles analyzed, the mean burnout prevalence rate among neurologists ranged from 18.1% to 94% (N = 8,735) across 6 countries (the United States, China, Philippines, Spain, Greece, and Brazil). Assessment of burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) revealed that almost two-thirds (65.9%) of neurologists (N = 7,816) report experiencing burnout. Ten studies (71.4%) assessed burnout by using the MBI; the other 4 studies used the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, a survey questionnaire generated by the American Academy of Neurology Stroke Practice Resources Workgroup, the Mini-Z survey, and a single question from the Physician Work Life Study. Among the 5 studies that used the same tool for measuring burnout (22-item MBI) and burnout criteria cutoff (emotional exhaustion [EE] ≥ 27 and/or depersonalization (DP) ≥ 10 subscale), the mean burnout rate ranged from 45% to 67% ( Summary: This meta-analysis of burnout among practicing neurologists reveals that available published data span different levels of training, different sample sizes, and different survey tools with different cutoffs used for burnout within the same tool. Although burnout rates among neurologists were found to differ by country, it is evident from this systematic review that a great deal of neurology physicians are experiencing burnout across the globe. This systematic review may inform future approaches to reduce burnout among neurologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.