Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703740›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Multicenter Evaluation of Morbidity and Predictors of Response to Imiquimod Treatment for Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Ofir Avitan, Laura Elst, Manon Vreeburg, Tynisha Rafael, Katja Jordanova, Niels Graafland, Kees Hendricksen, Bas W G van Rhijn, Henk G van der Poel, Maarten Albersen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ofir AvitanDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura ElstDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Manon VreeburgDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tynisha RafaelDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katja JordanovaDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels GraaflandDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees HendricksenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas W G van RhijnDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Oscar BrouwerDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Imiquimod (IQ) is an immunomodulator used in the management of penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) lesions. However, IQ treatment may be associated with bothersome side effects (SEs). To date, studies reporting on this morbidity and evaluating predictors of response to IQ are scarce and included small cohorts. The primary objective of our study was to assess the response to IQ treatment, associated SEs, and potential predictors of response in the largest reported cohort to date. Methods: We conducted a collaborative retrospective study involving patients diagnosed with PeIN and treated with IQ between 2010 and 2022 in two high-volume centers in the Netherlands and Belgium. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of PeIN and a minimum of 6-mo follow-up. Response to IQ was categorized as a complete response (CR), partial response, or no response. Descriptive statistics were generated and statistical tests included the Mann-Whitney U test for age and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Key findings and limitations: The study included a total of 44 patients, with a median age of 65.4 yr (interquartile range 56-72). Of these patients, 28 (64%) achieved a CR, while 14 (32%) had a partial response and two (4.5%) had no response. In the CR subgroup, the 3-yr recurrence rate was 25%. No significant correlation was found between response status and age, human papillomavirus status, history of penile cancer, or circumcision before treatment. Among the patients, 50% reported SEs, mainly local pain, irritation, and bleeding, and 12% discontinued treatment because of SEs. There was no significant correlation between CR and the incidence or type of SE. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the high overall response rate to IQ, a significant number of patients experienced local recurrence within 3 yr, and approximately half of the patients reported SEs. Our results did not identify any clinical or pathological factors or local SEs predictive of the therapeutic response to IQ. Prospective studies are needed to help in predicting which patients are likely to respond to IQ so that those who will not benefit can be spared the SEs associated with this treatment. Patient summary: Our study looked at responses to imiquimod (IQ), an immune-based treatment in cream format, for precancerous lesions on the penis, called penile intraepithelial neoplasia. More than 95% of patients had a complete or partial response to IQ, but 50% reported side effects, and 25% of the group with a complete response had recurrence within 3 years. More research is needed to help in selecting patients who will benefit the most from IQ treatment.

Indexed as

Complete responseHuman papillomavirusImiquimodPenile cancerPenile intraepithelial neoplasiaPrecancerous

Identifiers

PMID39703740
PMCPMC11656082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.