Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703680›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2024

Appropriate use of single-dose injectable aripiprazole lauroxil in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Rachael C Davis, Jianing Xu, Daniel B Hall, Xianyan Chen, Michaelyn M Moretz, Henry N Young, Joshua Caballero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael C DavisPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1645-9560
Jianing XuPhD Student, Department of Statistics, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-8867
Daniel B HallProfessor and Director, Statistical Consulting Center, Department of Statistics, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-2400
Xianyan ChenAssistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-0883
Michaelyn M MoretzPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9729-5480
Henry N YoungDepartment Head and Kroger Professor, Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-3288
Joshua Caballero(Corresponding author) Associate Professor, Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, joshua.caballero@uga.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4406-2425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Single-dose injectable aripiprazole lauroxil (SDIAL) is used with long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole lauroxil in the treatment of schizophrenia. SDIAL can be used to either initiate treatment or supplement during maintenance when follow-up doses are not given within labeling recommendations. The primary objective was to determine the usage and appropriateness of SDIAL between the initiation and the maintenance supplementation use in a Medicaid database. The secondary objective was to determine the overall associated costs with the potentially inappropriate use of LAI aripiprazole lauroxil. Methods: International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify adult patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (18-64 years) who received SDIAL and/or LAI aripiprazole lauroxil between 2018 and 2020 using MarketScan Medicaid databases. The appropriateness of SDIAL was determined by package insert labeling timelines for treatment initiation and maintenance supplementation. Two authors independently reviewed each SDIAL claim for appropriateness. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: After excluding possible billing errors, a total of 582 claims were identified for SDIAL. Of these, 21% were potentially inappropriate, with a higher proportion occurring during the maintenance phase. Overall, potential inappropriate use resulted in costs over $307 000. Discussion: It appears that prescribers should be better educated on the appropriate use of SDIAL during maintenance supplementation.

Indexed as

aripiprazole lauroxillong-acting injectable antipsychoticsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39703680
PMCPMC11616962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.