ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2024
Monkeypox (Mpox): Diagnosis and Emerging Challenges.
Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-generation mpox cluster in Chongqing, 2024: transmission chain investigation and phylogenetic characterization.Infection · 2026Article
- Development and clinical validation of a colorimetric isothermal assay for rapid detection of monkeypox virus.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Public health surveillance and outbreak preparedness for mpox.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2026Review
- Mpox Awareness and Vaccine Acceptability Among Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex With Men in India: Predictors and Implications for Outbreak Preparedness.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- Severe Anorectal Mpox With Newly Diagnosed HIV and Syphilis: A Diagnostic and Management Challenge.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monkeypox (Mpox) has once again been designated a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) as of August, 2024. The severity of the disease is underscored by its significant mortality rate, and unfortunately, there are no targeted therapeutics currently available for this viral infection. Management relies on preventive measures and the use of existing smallpox vaccines due to their genetic similarity to the Mpox virus. Diagnosing a disease is a critical aspect of managing any health condition, and for a highly contagious viral infection like Mpox, it is essential to employ a specific and sensitive diagnostic approach. The lack of adequate diagnostic facilities in laboratories poses a significant challenge, hindering accurate diagnoses and the identification of underlying etiologies, particularly in low-resource settings. Current serology-based diagnostic tests lack specificity for the Mpox virus, leading to cross-reactivity with other orthopoxviruses. With the emergence of new viral variants, molecular and genomic diagnostic methods are far more reliable for accurately confirming Mpox infections. This review focuses on current diagnostic methods approved worldwide and the future challenges that need to be addressed to effectively control and mitigate the spread of Mpox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.