Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703589›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024

A Comprehensive Review of Topography and Axon Counts in Upper-Extremity Peripheral Nerves: A Guide for Neurotization.

Ethan Paulin, Evan C Bowen, Shireen Dogar, Muntazim Mukit, Michael S Lebhar, Laura I Galarza, Shelley R Edwards, Marc E Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ethan PaulinJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Evan C BowenJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Shireen DogarJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Muntazim MukitJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Michael S LebharJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Laura I GalarzaJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Shelley R EdwardsJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Marc E WalkerJabaley-Songcharoen Hand Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Currently, no comprehensive database detailing topography and axon counts exists. This study aims to review the axon counts and topography of the major peripheral motor nerves of the upper extremity to allow for optimal surgical planning for peripheral nerve reconstruction via neurotization. Methods: Peer-reviewed journal articles were identified through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL. Studies were included for review based upon the identification of the described topography or axon count of any upper-extremity peripheral motor nerve. Animal research, laboratory studies, and unpublished studies were excluded from our review. A total of 43 studies were identified, and 38 of these met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to determine axon count averages for all upper extremity motor nerves identified in the included studies. Results: Thirty-eight studies were reviewed, giving insights into the topography and axon counts of the major peripheral nerves of the upper extremity, including the brachial plexus and its terminal branches as well as common donor nerves such as the spinal accessory nerve and intercostal nerves. Studies showed considerable variability in reported axon counts. Conclusions: Existing data were relatively weak and included several case reports and series. Taking this into consideration, we posit that there is a need for further studies of upper-extremity nerve axon counts that include large study populations and more consistent methods of nerve specimen analysis. Clinical relevance: Understanding the topographical anatomy of donor and recipient nerves, as well as appropriately matching the motor axon counts for each donor and recipient, is helpful in upper-extremity nerve reconstruction.

Indexed as

Axon countBrachial plexusNerve transferTopography

Identifiers

PMID39703589
PMCPMC11652313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.