ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024
Case Series of Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Pediatric Patients Treated with Allograft Repair.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application strategies of autologous and decellularized nerve grafts: Structural and functional recovery.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- More Than Epineurium Deep: Characterizing Peripheral Nerve Damage Using High-Resolution Micro-Computed Tomography for Simulated Peripheral Nerve Lacerations.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In the adult literature, allograft reconstruction of gapped peripheral nerve injuries has gained popularity over autologous nerve grafting. Allografts have demonstrated similar recovery while eliminating donor site morbidity. There is no well-defined incidence or treatment of such injuries in children. Our study explores the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic pediatric peripheral nerve injuries treated with allograft. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of a prospectively maintained database of all pediatric patients who underwent nerve allograft reconstruction at a Level I trauma center between September 2011 and July 2021. Results: We identified 24 allograft nerve reconstructions in 18 patients, average age 12.9 years (range 1.5-17.0) and 78% male. Five patients (28%) were injured in a motor vehicle accident, and four were injured by sharp laceration, machinery, and blast injury (22%). The most injured nerve was digital (n = 10, 42%) followed by 8 (33%) ulnar, and 4 (17%) median. The average gap length was 30.3 ± 23.8 mm (range 4-87 mm). Fifteen nerves were repaired within 24 hours (63%). Average follow-up was 13.7 ± 14.5 months (range 1.6-46.8 months). At final follow-up, 9 (38%) had full sensory recovery, 6 (25%) protective sensation, 2 (8%) deep pressure, and 1 (4%) no sensation but a positive Tinel's sign. Conclusions: Allograft reconstruction is a viable option for the treatment of traumatic pediatric peripheral nerve injuries with gaps not amenable to direct repair. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.