ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024
Upper-Extremity Injuries in a Level 1 Trauma Center Following Border Wall Height Increase.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: From 2018-2019, the height of over 400 miles of southern border wall was raised to 30 feet. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the increase in border wall height on upper-extremity injuries sustained via barrier fall. Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted with upper-extremity injuries sustained via border wall fall between January 2015 and December 2022 at a Level 1 trauma center serving the United States-Mexico border. Patients admitted between 2015-2018 were included in the preincrease group, and those admitted between 2019-2022 were included in the postincrease group. Demographic data, injury severity metrics, fracture characteristics, operative treatments, hospital charges, and lengths of stay were compared. Results: In total, 110 patients were identified, with 16 preincrease and 94 postincrease. Following the barrier height increase, patients had higher injury severity scores. Radial fractures were most common pre- and postincrease and accounted for nearly one-third of all fractures. Postincrease upper-extremity trauma patients required more operative events (2.15 ± 2.10 vs 1.44 ± 0.73 preincrease). The average cost for each patient's hospital stay also quadrupled after the increase in wall height ($397,632 ± $1,057,574 vs $98,978 ± $84,169 preincrease). Conclusions: The increase in overall injury severity and costly inpatient treatment of upper-extremity injuries among patients who fell from the border following construction has placed additional stress on an already strained health care system. Level of Evidence: Differential Diagnosis/Symptom Prevalence Study, IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.