ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024
Sex Disparities Affecting Postoperative Outcomes After Total Elbow Arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate sex disparities in 30-day postoperative outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty. Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files were queried for all patients who underwent a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) between 2006 and 2020. Sex disparities in preoperative variables were studied using Fisher exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of postoperative outcomes for women in comparison with men. Results: A total of 788 patients underwent a TEA in the period of 2006-2020. Of those, 180 were men, and 608 were women. We found an increase in TEAs performed each year with a predominance in females compared to males. Additionally, our work demonstrated increased statistically significant odds of a major adverse cardiac event ( Conclusions: Following a TEA, women had higher adjusted postoperative odds of experiencing a major adverse cardiac event, requiring transfusion, and return to the operating room. No significant differences were found in wound outcomes, pulmonary outcomes, venous thromboembolic outcomes, sepsis, and length of stay. Overall mortality rates were similar between the two groups. Our study warrants further evaluation of the root cause of sex disparities in TEA outcomes and methods to improve care delivery to reduce those disparities. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic 2b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.