Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703569›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2025

Groundwater electro-bioremediation via diffuse electro-conductive zones: A critical review.

Federico Aulenta, Matteo Tucci, Carolina Cruz Viggi, Stefano Milia, Seyedmehdi Hosseini, Gianluigi Farru, Rajandrea Sethi, Carlo Bianco, Tiziana Tosco, Marios Ioannidis and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decision-grade digital twins forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Magnetite Nanoparticles Enhancing HGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Federico AulentaWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), Montelibretti (RM), Italy.
Matteo TucciWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), Montelibretti (RM), Italy.
Carolina Cruz ViggiWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), Montelibretti (RM), Italy.
Stefano MiliaInstitute of Environmental Geology and Geoengineering (IGAG), National Research Council (CNR), Cagliari, Italy.
Seyedmehdi HosseiniDepartment of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Gianluigi FarruDepartment of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Rajandrea SethiDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering & Clean Water Center, CWC, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Carlo BiancoDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering & Clean Water Center, CWC, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Tiziana ToscoDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering & Clean Water Center, CWC, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Marios IoannidisDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering & Clean Water Center, CWC, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Giulio ZanaroliDepartment of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo RuffoDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Carlo SantoroDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Ugo MarzocchiCenter for Water Technology WATEC, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Giorgio CassianiDepartment of Geosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Luca PeruzzoDepartment of Geosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial electrochemical technologies (MET) can remove a variety of organic and inorganic pollutants from contaminated groundwater. However, despite significant laboratory-scale successes over the past decade, field-scale applications remain limited. We hypothesize that enhancing the electrochemical conductivity of the soil surrounding electrodes could be a groundbreaking and cost-effective alternative to deploying numerous high-surface-area electrodes in short distances. This could be achieved by injecting environmentally safe iron- or carbon-based conductive (nano)particles into the aquifer. Upon transport and deposition onto soil grains, these particles create an electrically conductive zone that can be exploited to control and fine-tune the delivery of electron donors or acceptors over large distances, thereby driving the process more efficiently. Beyond extending the radius of influence of electrodes, these diffuse electro-conductive zones (DECZ) could also promote the development of syntrophic anaerobic communities that degrade contaminants via direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET). In this review, we present the state-of-the-art in applying conductive materials for MET and DIET-based applications. We also provide a comprehensive overview of the physicochemical properties of candidate electrochemically conductive materials and related injection strategies suitable for field-scale implementation. Finally, we illustrate and critically discuss current and prospective electrochemical and geophysical methods for measuring soil electronic conductivity-both in the laboratory and in the field-before and after injection practices, which are crucial for determining the extent of DECZ. This review article provides critical information for a robust design and

Indexed as

DIET-based bioremediationDiffuse electro-conductive zoneElectro-bioremediationGeophysical methodsRadius of influence

Identifiers

PMID39703569
PMCPMC11655697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.